Leaderboard

Heya, decided to make my own face rig. Full customization ranging from different eye sparkle designs to two different mouth styles. Here's some screenshots below Credit is appreciated. NOTE: There should be a .txt file inside the zip, be sure to read that in order to get the shadows on the face rig to work correctly.

doing a remake of a art piece by DecLXIV(Here is his twitter

I actually fixed this in 1.3.0 during development and back-ported the fix for 1.2.7. I thought nothing of it when porting the one line of code that fixes it but I guess because Mine-imator 1.2.7 uses a different GameMaker version, it must've done nothing. I can confirm that this will be fixed when 1.3.0 releases;

So what you're saying is people aren't creative when it comes to making a minecraft skin. However this isn't just a skin, there's much more detail than a single pixel. So even if you HAD to move the eyes down while making a skin, which you dont, with this amount of detail that wouldn't matter one bit.

?

DOWNLOAD Happy animating, mew!

I'm locking this.

It's my first time writing a post on forum ZIL-131 Truck, with a civilian variant Dacia 1300 UAZ-469 Pickup truck from PUBG, Fog light and hardtop roof can be disabled. 1986 Fleetwood bounder RV Huey UH-1 Helicopter Those rigs were made only with mine-imator, so timeline and library can get kinda dirty and rigs might be unstable. Ford Crown Victoria LTD, with a police interceptor and taxi. For now, Ford Crown Victoria LTD is the only rig I've made with Modelbench. If you want to color it, please follow the instructions 1. Select those parts 2. Disable "Color" from hierarchy tab (right side) 3. Color it with RGB, HSB and MIX Download Link: http://www.mediafire.com/file/8ia61ab140wqafl/Salem%27s_Vehicle_Rigs_%282%29.zip/file Thanks for reading! + If you're looking for Ford Crown Victoria LTD / Pickup Truck, I recommend going here as I remade those.

preview: Skysphere:

This is a test for lighting and Mine-imator visuals. I know the outside is dark oof. Credits to @Keep on Chucking for his tips on the visuals @anima cryses for his Springbonnie rig

So i wanted to try to use Mine-imator as someone who has had practice in Source Filmmaker and its different. So tips are wanted and stuff. This is my first try at art in this program hope its okay for the eyes. I really did try there is just a bunch of different stuff to learn.

Thx! : D

i like it i cant give anymore reactions today so take this

C:\Users\[YOUR USERNAME]\Mine-imator\Data\Minecraft Then open one of the minecraft version zipped folders and go to Assets > minecraft > textures

no

Its the nose and the fact the pupils are pure white as default makes it looks bad and the reason people move females eyes lower then males they just look better that way cus of the eyelashes taking up more space.

Making the height of the eyes the same as the male looks bad. Also, how so does it look ugly?

Okay, this face rig is easily one of the best I've seen so far on this site. It has all the customisation you could need and it even works with shadows! I'm definitely using this from now on, with some personal modifications of course. Amazing job, ShotU!

spoilers inside spoilers inside spoilers very creative

All scale friendly, I made sure of that when making it

1.01 is the latest version and for the suggestion, the steve and alex templates are literally just that

Wizard Wars The Wizard Wars is a wallpaper I've made for an upcoming project in the near future. More details will be revealed on the 1st of July, but until then, I hope you enjoy the wallpaper.

post it on a site like imgur, then copy and paste it's link.

Calling everyone who disagrees with your preference "stupid" is not going to get your argument across very well, just saying. No-one even insulted you, so why do you feel the need to say this? You didn't get "attacked", people simply gave their criticism on the render, like they do with any other render, and it just so happened that it was more directed towards the facial expression than anything else. You're just being over-defensive and taking it as a personal attack instead of the simple criticism it actually is. You absolutely are. Given the way you're reacting to everyone here, I'd argue you're the aggressive one here. Again, it's not connected to "personal frustrations" whatsoever, it's just simple criticism that just so happened to be focused on one thing. This sort of thing happens to everyone, not just you. People criticise others' work. That's how the forum works. ...unless you make it into one. Also, this is a render, not an animation, so I have absolutely no idea why you're bringing up this irrelevant point. Practice what you preach. I've literally never seen you doing this on the forums whatsoever.

download link:http://www.mediafire.com/file/l8qh7m5lmqhkxvp/liqueur.rar/file ummm...do you want to drink?

Cyriak videos are always trippy and weird

I think this face rig looks really ugly tbh. Also why are the male and female eyes at different heights?

The problem with the community is not understanding styles and preferences. Everyone is the smartest person in the room and half of people will stand against your argument, while the other half will support you, all in all the other half will always remain stupid. The thing about eyes is more than obviously just a personal preference and I never gave my opinion on it, because i honestly don't care what you guys do with your renders, unlike me, who got "attacked" for using my style. I never liked it, but it doesn't mean I should speak up about it if it's uncalled for. I know some people prefer the eyes closer, and i also know a lot of people who don't. Again, it's a style of personal preference, not neglating critisism. I'm sorry if you feel this way, but i'm not trying to stand above anybody in this argument. I'm stating my preferences and defending my style. Some people like it, some dont. There's nothing you can do about that, but there is absolutely no call for getting aggressive, calling anybody out or pointing the finger here. You've mentioned that I critisize people, and i'm assuming you're pointing at my SYSTM series, which is true. However, the people who submit their work are literally asking for critisism on my behalf, from my perspective and my preferences. I always acknowledge styles, I say i personally dislike it, but it's alright to push your own thing - feel free to watch the series if you need solid evidence. In case anyone gets offended by my critisism or finds it unfair, we've had a few cased where we calmly resolved everything in the comment section of the video. Nobody has ever left unsatisfied from my series, except people who have never watched it and assumed I'm the world's biggest jackass, spitting on other's hard work. It's obvious that in this argument, a lot of stuff thrown around is connected to personal frustrations, and it's already gone way too far over something like "eye preferences". No style is objectively better than the other, but as soon as you start forcing yours onto others, that's where it's wrong. Animation isn't a competition, it's a form of art, creation and expression. Arguing about 'who is better' is completely pointless and I long for the day when the community can step thogether and encourage eachother on their work.

alright bud, you do you

To clarify things, I don't have any issues with critisism; you think the eyes are too far apart and centered? Alright, thank you for your input, but i prefer my style and i personally feel like what i've done looks better. It's my wallpaper, and i like it better this way. Nothing wrong with that. What i do have a problem with, is how the "critisism" was addressed. The first ever comment said "honestly, that just looks horrible". There's a lot of healthier alternatives to get the message across. "i feel like ...", "i think that .." Please don't bash me for getting defensive, while the comments were directed to begin with. From then, the situation just escalated and this whole thing went too far.

I never said anything about your comments, personally. I've said nothing about the rest of the comments, because they were either constructive or i could generally spet on their side and accept their point. The comment about the eyes had neither of that, so i agree that i've replied in a defensive matter, my bad on that. That's where it all began.

Optimist: The glass is half full. Pessimist: The glass is half empty. Potato chip company: The glass is full!