Nimi

lik if u cri ever tim

lik if u cri ever tim

lik if u cri ever tim

Only Voxy made the logos, they're illustrated manually.

Only Voxy made the logos, they're illustrated manually.

Only Voxy made the logos, they're illustrated manually.

You should be able to import the horse from the Mine-imator model files, but you may need to relink the texture file since the texture paths for Mine-imator's internal models are different from average models.

Not the slightest clue. 

Modelbench's speed isn't to be underestimated. 

Modelbench's speed isn't to be underestimated. 

The interface is sized differently due to GameMaker changing how it scales games on windows, which can't be changed from what I've seen so far. As far as David and I are aware of, Mine-imator 1.1 runs as fast as it can, even with new optimization methods that have been put in place. Try closing out of some others programs you have up.

Sounds like that school is to die for.

Since I've got better things to do with my crunched time, I'm just gonna wrap this up;
 
"So why did Josh get the points and why does he still have them not removed?"
Josh put it nicely in his latest PM appeal to Emu(in their own words) saying that the way they went about their actions to get the rule put on the topic was(and I quote) both unconventional and pretty irresponsible. They also said they would understand if we decided to let them keep them.
 
"Why did they get three points for what they did? What they did was justifiable."
The fact that Josh decided to play along with Heavenira's duplicate topic instead of telling him to remove/hide the topic(They seem to both be in close communication from the looks of your screenshots on Discord.) gave the impression that making a duplicate topic and running with it was A-OK. And as for the reputation abuse, the two(whether it was a collaborative effort or not) were downvoting innocent and confused members.(Due to the duplication of the topics.)
Whether you're convinced or not, I'm done here.

Since I've got better things to do with my crunched time, I'm just gonna wrap this up;
 
"So why did Josh get the points and why does he still have them not removed?"
Josh put it nicely in his latest PM appeal to Emu(in their own words) saying that the way they went about their actions to get the rule put on the topic was(and I quote) both unconventional and pretty irresponsible. They also said they would understand if we decided to let them keep them.
 
"Why did they get three points for what they did? What they did was justifiable."
The fact that Josh decided to play along with Heavenira's duplicate topic instead of telling him to remove/hide the topic(They seem to both be in close communication from the looks of your screenshots on Discord.) gave the impression that making a duplicate topic and running with it was A-OK. And as for the reputation abuse, the two(whether it was a collaborative effort or not) were downvoting innocent and confused members.(Due to the duplication of the topics.)
Whether you're convinced or not, I'm done here.

As for Josh's 7 warning points for the banned icon, they were not all given at the same time. We removed their 'bannned' icon the first time they did it with no consequences, but then they continued to use it, and we continued to remove it, eventually giving two warning points, then another two, then eventually three(Given points go up if it's a repeated offense.) after having to keep removing their banned icon. While it wasn't in the rules at the time, it's common sense to not use it as people have faced consequences in the past for using it(usually just have their icon reset and told not to use it), and it causes confusion upon members and moderators when determining who's actually banned.
Also, you mean to tell me that this is not reputation abuse?

As for Josh's 7 warning points for the banned icon, they were not all given at the same time. We removed their 'bannned' icon the first time they did it with no consequences, but then they continued to use it, and we continued to remove it, eventually giving two warning points, then another two, then eventually three(Given points go up if it's a repeated offense.) after having to keep removing their banned icon. While it wasn't in the rules at the time, it's common sense to not use it as people have faced consequences in the past for using it(usually just have their icon reset and told not to use it), and it causes confusion upon members and moderators when determining who's actually banned.
Also, you mean to tell me that this is not reputation abuse?

As for Josh's 7 warning points for the banned icon, they were not all given at the same time. We removed their 'bannned' icon the first time they did it with no consequences, but then they continued to use it, and we continued to remove it, eventually giving two warning points, then another two, then eventually three(Given points go up if it's a repeated offense.) after having to keep removing their banned icon. While it wasn't in the rules at the time, it's common sense to not use it as people have faced consequences in the past for using it(usually just have their icon reset and told not to use it), and it causes confusion upon members and moderators when determining who's actually banned.
Also, you mean to tell me that this is not reputation abuse?

As for Josh's 7 warning points for the banned icon, they were not all given at the same time. We removed their 'bannned' icon the first time they did it with no consequences, but then they continued to use it, and we continued to remove it, eventually giving two warning points, then another two, then eventually three(Given points go up if it's a repeated offense.) after having to keep removing their banned icon. While it wasn't in the rules at the time, it's common sense to not use it as people have faced consequences in the past for using it(usually just have their icon reset and told not to use it), and it causes confusion upon members and moderators when determining who's actually banned.
Also, you mean to tell me that this is not reputation abuse?

They wouldn't stop being rude to others, despite already being warned to stop.

@TheIanPlays88 I wish..

They wouldn't stop being rude to others, despite already being warned to stop.

They wouldn't stop being rude to others, despite already being warned to stop.

Are we now sponsored by McDonalds?

Are we now sponsored by McDonalds?

Thanks.