[Art] Before/After Pics

[EndahGurl 2k]

Basically I took a screenshot of some random scenery in Mine-imator, then went in with Paint.NET and edited it.
 
Before:

 
After:

(I have no clue what that funky red outline surrounding the trees' leaves is :/)

[MisturieDood 1.3k]

i like it without paint.NET,i don't like feeding pictures effect drugs

[Lumie 5.8k]

i like it without paint.NET,i don't like feeding pictures effect drugs

agree on that

i like the Lens flare tho, the light chaning on the paint.Net version is, a bit weird.

still good, and what's the name of the lens flare plugin ? i found one, but it was really bad..

 

 

 

and the poll should have a "needs more work"

Edited August 2, 2014 by DurRubinRux

[AzoeGamer 101]

EPILEPSY!!!!!!!!!!! Any way it is good but no person there

[Zeno 2.9k]

Any way it is good but no person there

[Arquy 347]

Looks good enough.,

[iChibi 67]

Before

 

After 

 

Which is better?

I'm sorry for posting my Before and After, I hope it's okay.

[tditdatdwt 3.3k]

here's the deal making images darker and put lens flares does not make it look better.. i like the old one much more.. except for the DOF.. the DOF should be becoming better soon tho i hear..

[Voxy 7.3k]

Well uh, before/after pictures can be interesting sometimes, but I don't believe it's the case here.

You just played around with the brightness and contrast, added a lens flare and tried to draw waves in the water. It's not worth showing both pics. And the effects you added don't really make the image "ooo so bootiful".

[flufffybuns 926]

Well uh, before/after pictures can be interesting sometimes, but I don't believe it's the case here.

You just played around with the brightness and contrast, added a lens flare and tried to draw waves in the water. It's not worth showing both pics. And the effects you added don't really make the image "ooo so bootiful".

Who cares... It's just an image.

[Voxy 7.3k]

Who cares... It's just an image.

I care! ;~;