.gif.6e726aaedc573ab6e19dace9bc0d8164.gif)
.thumb.png.390485a5fc98c155d01b7e6e35844afb.png)
SpoonMan.thumb.png.015f14142de4e9d2e632d8baaa37798c.png)
About Spontaneous Explosions
-
Rank
Dew it
- Birthday 09/05/1877
Recent Profile Visitors
Single Status Update
See all updates by Spontaneous Explosions
-
Am I the only one who cringes at the sight of 90s/early 2000s CGI?
I think totally CGI characters work better when they're non human. like Thanos, Rocket and Professor Hulk are believable. I know it's CG but i don't really think of it that way. Tarkin in Rouge One was realistic, but you could still tell it was CGI.
-
- Cryptic Runner and Draco63
-
2
- Show previous comments 2 more
-
.thumb.gif.6d6df435ea78ed3428e1b87043f2a837.gif)
-
I actually have more of an issue with modern CGI. Looks like crap most of the time; mass produced CGI effects, scenes, characters, usually not fitting in with the world around it and just completely screwing over the visuals of movies. I would rather watch the 90s through early 2000s CGI than a lot of the stuff we have now. Even the big movies like the Hobbit trilogy, the new Star Wars movies, and more recent Marvel movies just have such garbage CGI. Sometimes it'd look okay if it were on its own outside of the real world, but most of the time, the blending into what we know to be the real world is just abysmally done. Doesn't fit and ruins immersion. Plus, the editing done is insane. A lot of movies look like someone filmed it and then applied 20 snapchat filters to make it look "better" but really just made it look super flashy and unrealistic, obviously fake.
-
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.