Voxy

You need to learn the difference between an icon and a logo, then. This is the new logo, which has been sitting in our signatures for a while now:

 
The filmstrip icon is... just an icon. Who cares? It's just gonna sit in your taskbar or show up as a favicon, and for that purpose, I think it represents 'animation' a looot better than the blurry mess the current icon turns into if you shrink it down, even if isn't as Minecraft-y as the previous one.

 
Also, saying it's "not appealing" is just a matter of taste. Personally, I find the new icons much more pleasant to look at than ones you can't even properly read unless they're 100px tall.

You need to learn the difference between an icon and a logo, then. This is the new logo, which has been sitting in our signatures for a while now:

 
The filmstrip icon is... just an icon. Who cares? It's just gonna sit in your taskbar or show up as a favicon, and for that purpose, I think it represents 'animation' a looot better than the blurry mess the current icon turns into if you shrink it down, even if isn't as Minecraft-y as the previous one.

 
Also, saying it's "not appealing" is just a matter of taste. Personally, I find the new icons much more pleasant to look at than ones you can't even properly read unless they're 100px tall.

You need to learn the difference between an icon and a logo, then. This is the new logo, which has been sitting in our signatures for a while now:

 
The filmstrip icon is... just an icon. Who cares? It's just gonna sit in your taskbar or show up as a favicon, and for that purpose, I think it represents 'animation' a looot better than the blurry mess the current icon turns into if you shrink it down, even if isn't as Minecraft-y as the previous one.

 
Also, saying it's "not appealing" is just a matter of taste. Personally, I find the new icons much more pleasant to look at than ones you can't even properly read unless they're 100px tall.

Personally I find the new icon more appealing and cleaner; the only problem I have is that it doesn't really look Minecraft-y. I guess I could get used to that though, it's not a huge deal.

Make America Sweaty Again!

You know the argument goes both ways

I think it's better seen as a new toolset. It still is maturing and the community still needs to learn to use it. Give it some time and you'll probably get a decent selection of shaders that will look just as good as what there is on the Java side, with the advantage of it performing even better thanks to DLSS.

That's actually a good idea, we'll consider it!

I think it's better seen as a new toolset. It still is maturing and the community still needs to learn to use it. Give it some time and you'll probably get a decent selection of shaders that will look just as good as what there is on the Java side, with the advantage of it performing even better thanks to DLSS.

So it's okay to make fun of an old man who got his head cracked open but calling someone a bootlicker is crossing the line? ?

So it's okay to make fun of an old man who got his head cracked open but calling someone a bootlicker is crossing the line? ?

So it's okay to make fun of an old man who got his head cracked open but calling someone a bootlicker is crossing the line? ?

Did you take over Mineshaft's role as the proud bootlicker of the MI forums?

Did you take over Mineshaft's role as the proud bootlicker of the MI forums?

Did you take over Mineshaft's role as the proud bootlicker of the MI forums?

Did you take over Mineshaft's role as the proud bootlicker of the MI forums?

Did you take over Mineshaft's role as the proud bootlicker of the MI forums?

Man, good thing that police officer was here to handle this violent protester!!
 
 
 

Well, okay, but there's a difference between saying "it should be investigated" and "there's fraud".
If one's gonna claim there was fraud, they should be expected to be asked to back up their claims. That response he gave just destroyed any ounce of credibility he had.

@Spontaneous Explosions Shifting the burden of proof, eh?

@Spontaneous Explosions Shifting the burden of proof, eh?

@Spontaneous Explosions Any actual proof of this "fraud"? Or are you just following Trump's claim?

You know the argument goes both ways

You know the argument goes both ways